The science of Breaking Bad: To’hajiilee

Breaking Bad | Season 5 | Episode 13 | “To’hajiilee”

Don't drink and drive. But if you do, better call Saul!

Don’t drink and drive. But if you do, better call Saul!

Bluffing, confrontations and desperation in tonight’s episode, with the only really certain thing being that there are several episodes left with which Breaking Bad can continue to surprise us.

This episode is reviewed at Emilia Jordan and the A.V. Club, and you can read more about it at AMC and IMDb.

Random thoughts

With “where you really live” being a reference to Walt’s money, my prediction from last week was completely wrong. This is why I write about the science and not the plot. That said:

We know that Walt survives this encounter in the desert as we’ve seen him in the flash-forward. Does the fact that he has hair indicate that he’s beaten the cancer again, or that he’s stopped chemotherapy because there’s no point any more?

For what it’s worth, I think that Jesse will end up captured and cooking for Uncle Jack (and Operation Blue), and that Walt’s military-level arsenal is for storming the place and getting him out. So expect the exact opposite to happen next week.

Todd has inherited Walt’s equipment from his pest control days, but unfortunately not his skills. I couldn’t quite place the device used to check the meth purity at first:

  • It looks a little like a handheld microscope, but is missing the light source and probably wouldn’t work on such a thick sample.
  • It probably isn’t a spectrophotometer, as they would require an enclosed sample area.
  • Devices used to measure things like melting point and conductivity look quite different.
  • With the black plate for the sample, it looks a bit like a lab-on-a-chip or immunoassay device – but then where are the microfluidics and why the eyepiece?
  • The eyepiece is a real puzzle, since most digital measurement devices would display their output on a screen.
  • I believe that the device is a traditional handheld refractometer, a relatively simple piece of kit used to measure the refractive index of a liquid.

The refractive index of a substance is a number that describes how quickly radiation (light) travels through the substance. As you might expect, light tends to travel more slowly through denser substances (like water) than through less dense ones (like air). This is why a prism will break white light up into its constituent colours – refractive index index depends on wavelength. When the light enters the denser medium of the prism, the colours with shorter wavelengths (at the violet end of the rainbow) slow down more than the colours with longer wavelengths (at the red end) and separate out in a phenomenon called dispersion.

The refractive index of a solution depends on the concentration of whatever’s dissolved in it, so it can quite easily be used to confirm the purity of something. By comparing the refractive index of the “aquamarine” sample to that of a “blue” sample (or, more likely, to a table of known refractive indices for pure methamphetamine), Todd can make a fairly good guess as to the purity of his product.

However, Todd cannot be completely certain of his 76 % claim without knowing how the impurities in his product affect its refractive index. If he were measuring methamphetamine in a known solution (e.g. water) then he wouldn’t have a problem – it’s all the unknown stuff messing up the speed of light that’s going to send his errors skyrocketing.

Callback to Madrigal: Refractometry is also used to assess the sugar content (i.e. Brix number) of sugar-containing solutions.

Uncle Jack is little reckless in opening fire while Walt’s in the car – Hank and Steve are probably relatively safe behind the engine block (and, by the look of things, everyone is a terrible shot anyway), but the car doors protecting Walt may as well be made of tissue paper.

Elements in the credits

Breaking Bromine
Bad Barium
Created Chromium
Bryan Cranston Bromine
AnNa Gunn Sodium
AAron Paul Argon
DeaN Norris Nitrogen
Betsy Brandt Beryllium
RJ MitTe Tellurium
BOb Odenkirk Oxygen
Laura Fraser Francium
JEsse Plemons Einsteinium
Steven MicHael Quezada Hydrogen
Emily RiOs Osmium
Lavell Crawford Chromium
Michael Bowen Boron
Kevin Rankin Radium
Kelley Dixon Potassium
Mark FreeboRn Radon
MiChael Slovis Carbon
Dave Porter Polonium
Sharon Bialy Sulfur
Sherry Thomas Thorium
BrYan Cranston Yttrium
DiaNe Mercer Neon
Moira Walley-Beckett Molybdenum
Thomas SchnAuz Gold
George Mastras Germanium
PeTer Gould Tellurium
Sam Catlin Calcium
Melissa Bernstein Beryllium
MicHelle MacLaren Helium
Mark JOhnson Oxygen
StewArt A. Lyons Argon
GeorGe Mastras Germanium
Michelle MacLaRen Rhenium
Vince Gilligan Vanadium

One Response to The science of Breaking Bad: To’hajiilee

  1. […] an answer to what they’re using, check out Weak Interactions post on the science behind “To’hajiilee” – thanks […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 265 other followers

%d bloggers like this: